Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Bettius & Sanderson, P.C. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.

December 19, 1989

BETTIUS & SANDERSON, P.C., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT
v.
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE; NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT V. BETTIUS & SANDERSON, P.C., PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE



Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. CA-86-70-A.

Hall and Murnaghan, Circuit Judges, and Butzner, Senior Circuit Judge.

Author: Per Curiam

In Bettius & Sanderson, P.C. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., 839 F.2d 1009 (4th Cir. 1988), we sustained a professional corporation's argument that compensation paid to its principals was relevant to show its net profits in an action to recover damages for lost profits. At trial on remand, the court entered judgment on the jury's verdict in favor of the corporation in the amount of $250,000. The corporation appeals, assigning error to the admission of evidence showing the subsequent earnings of former principals to offset the lost profits of the professional corporation. We affirm.

The professional corporation was permitted to show the amount disbursed to its principals in order to prove the loss caused by the defendant. See Bettius I, 839 F.2d at 1012-14. The principals, however, continued to practice law with other firms. Their earnings offset the loss they suffered when the defendant harmed the professional corporation in which they were formerly principals. The district court quite properly treated the professional corporation in effect as a partnership for the purpose of determining the principals' loss. Cf. Johnson v. Oroweat Foods, Inc., 785 F.2d 503, 508-10 (4th Cir. 1986) (partners' loss caused by breach of contract terminating partnership's business must be offset or mitigated by future earnings of partners).

We find no cause for reversal in the other assignments of error.

19891219

© 1998 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.