Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Newton v. Fairfax County Police Department

Court of Appeals of Virginia

April 27, 1999

ROBERT RUSSELL NEWTON, KATHLEEN HONEY NEWTON, ROBERT RUSSELL NEWTON, JR., AND MISTY NICOLE NEWTON
v.
FAIRFAX COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT/FAIRFAX COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION.

Michael A. Kernbach (Jack T. Burgess & Associates, P.C., on brief), for appellants.

Ann Gouldin Killalea, Assistant County Attorney, (David P. Bobzien, County Attorney; Robert Lyndon Howell, Deputy County Attorney, on brief), for appellee.

Present: Judge Bray, Senior Judges Duff and Overton.

MEMORANDUM OPINION [*]

CHARLES H. DUFF, JUDGE

Robert Russell Newton (" deceased employee"), Kathleen Honey Newton (widow), Robert Russell Newton, Jr. (son), and Misty Nicole Newton (daughter) (hereinafter referred to as " the statutory beneficiaries") appeal a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission (" commission") denying their claim for benefits. The statutory beneficiaries contend that the commission erred in finding that this Court's holding in Arlington County Fire Dept. v. Stebbins, 21 Va.App. 570, 466 S.E.2d 124 (1996), precluded an award of indemnity benefits to them pursuant to Code § 65.2-512, where the deceased employee had voluntarily retired and earned no wages during the fifty-two weeks immediately preceding his death or within the fifty-two weeks immediately preceding the communication of the diagnosis of the occupational disease resulting in his death. Because we find that Stebbins is dispositive of this case, we affirm the commission's decision.

The facts are undisputed. The deceased employee worked for Fairfax County Police Department (" employer") for twenty-one years before retiring on December 11, 1993. On June 9, 1996, the deceased employee suffered a fatal heart attack. On July 23, 1996, the statutory beneficiaries filed a claim for benefits alleging an occupational heart disease. Employer stipulated that the claim was compensable under the presumption provided in Code § 65.2-402 and accepted responsibility for medical and funeral expenses. However, employer denied responsibility for weekly indemnity benefits.

On March 31, 1998, the parties stipulated to these additional facts:

1. The deceased [employee] received a communication of an occupational disease, heart disease, on or about May 23, 1996.
2. The deceased [employee] was not seeking employment within the 52 weeks preceding the date of communication of the diagnosis of the occupational disease or the date of death.
3. The deceased [employee] received no earnings from employment during the 52 weeks preceding the date of communication of the diagnosis of the occupational disease or the date of death. The deceased [employee] had voluntarily retired on December 11, 1993 and was receiving a monthly retirement benefit in the amount of $ 2, 459.44. Upon his death, the monthly retirement benefit decreased to $ 1, 329.17, payable to his wife, and $ 531.66 to each minor child.

In denying the statutory beneficiaries' claim for indemnity benefits, the commission found as follows:

The purpose of weekly compensation benefits for temporary total or temporary partial disability is wage replacement. The weekly benefits to an injured worker directly relate to his earnings. Similarly, the purpose of the weekly compensation death benefits, based on the decedent's average weekly wage, is to replace the wages lost to the dependents as a result of the death. Accordingly, the weekly benefits directly relate to the decedent's earnings, just as the benefits to an injured employee directly relate to his earnings. In the case of death benefits, the statutory dependents' eligibility for the benefits pursuant to Code § 65.2-512 are based on the relationship between the decedent and the dependents. These benefits are not abrogated by the fact that the decedent may not have had a wage loss. Only the amount of the benefits are affected by the apparent lack of wage loss . Thus, the dependents may receive the burial and transportation expenses provided by the statute. However, pursuant to the reasoning in Stebbins, no indemnity benefits should be awarded if the decedent had no income for the 52 weeks preceding the communication of the diagnosis.
Code § 65.2-512(A) provides that " if death results from [an] accident within nine years, the employer shall pay, or cause to be paid, compensation in weekly payments equal to 66 2/3 percent of the employee's average weekly wages . . . ." Code § 65.2-101 defines " average weekly wage" to mean " the earnings of the injured employee in the employment in which he was working at the time of the injury during the period of fifty-two weeks immediately preceding the date of the injury, divided by fifty-two . . . ." In occupational disease cases, the date of the first communication of the diagnosis of ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.