Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Horsford v. Webel

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division

January 30, 2014

DURAN E. HORSFORD, Plaintiff,
v.
N.J. WEBEL, et al., Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAMES R. SPENCER, District Judge.

By Memorandum Order entered on August 28, 2012, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiffs action. At that time, the Court warned Plaintiff that the Court would dismiss his action if he failed to keep the Court informed of his current address. On November 20, 2013, the United States Postal Service returned a November 13, 2013 Memorandum Order to the Court marked, "RETURN TO SENDER, " because Plaintiff apparently relocated. Since that date, Plaintiff has not contacted the Court to provide a current address. Plaintiffs failure to contact the Court and provide a current address indicates his lack of interest in prosecuting this action. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.