Searching over 5,500,000 cases.

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Melton v. Ronan

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division

February 28, 2014

Gene Melton, Plaintiff,
Susan A. Ronan, et al., Defendants.


GERALD BRUCE LEE, District Judge.

This Matter comes before the Court upon review of plaintiff's complaint. Gene Melton, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking monetary damages for the alleged harm caused by the court reporter during his sentencing. By Order dated November 22, 2013, the Court directed plaintiff to sign and file a Consent Form. Plaintiff has complied with the Court's Order. Now before the Court is plaintiffs Motion to Appoint Counsel, which will be denied, and two "amended complaints, " which will be construed as motions to amend. Docket Nos. 7 & 17. Each motion is discussed below.

Motion to Appoint Counsel

A court may request an attorney to represent an indigent plaintiff proceeding in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). The Fourth Circuit, however, has limited the appointment of counsel to cases where "exceptional circumstances" exist, such as cases with particularly complex factual and legal issues or with a litigant who is unable to represent himself adequately. Whisenant v. Yuam , 739 F.2d 160, 163 (4th Cir. 1984). It is unnecessary at this time to appoint counsel for plaintiff, as plaintiff has made no showing of "exceptional circumstances" in his case that would warrant appointment of counsel. In addition, to date, plaintiff has ably filed his complaint and motions, as well as demonstrated comprehension of the procedures and laws of this Court. Thus, plaintiffs request for the appointment of counsel will be denied, without prejudice to renewal at a later stage of the proceedings, if appropriate.

Motions to Amend

Plaintiff submitted two "amended complaints, " construed as motions to amend. In his first Motion to Amend, docket no. 7, plaintiff seeks to add "claims which [he] neglected to send in his original complaint." Plaintiff seeks to add a First Amendment claim "for access to the Court" and a Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Claim. In total plaintiff states:

Due to her negligence, it affected me on my appeal, and reduced [sic] my chances of winning my appeal. Article 7. All are equal before [sic] the law and are entitled without any discrimination the equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

Motions to amend are committed to the discretion of the trial court. Keller v. Prince George's County , 923 F.2d 30, 33 (4th Cir. 1991). In general leave to amend "shall be freely given when justice so requires, " Fed.R.Civ.P. 15 (a), and a pro se litigant in particular "should be afforded every reasonable opportunity to demonstrate that he has a valid claim." Dluhos v. Floating & Abandoned Vessel Known as "New York, " 162 F.3d 63 , 69-70 (2nd Cir. 1998). On the other hand, a motion to amend warrants denial where there is "an apparent or declared reason [for doing so] - such as undue delay, bad faith, or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party... [or] futility of [the] amendment." Id . at 69 (quoting Foman v. Davis , 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962)). Plaintiffs bare and conclusory statements fail to state a claim, and, as such, his first Motion to Amend will be denied.

In his second Motion to Amend, however, plaintiff seeks to bring to the Court's attention specific instances of how defendant allegedly altered his transcripts. As these are not conclusory statements but factual allegations that he seeks to add to his original complaint, this Motion to Amend will be granted.

After careful review of plaintiffs complaint and amended complaint, it is clear that the complaint must be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim.[1]

I. Factual Background

Plaintiff alleges that defendant Ronan, the court reporter at his criminal trial, sent his appellate counsel an inaccurate copy of his trial transcript. Compl. 4. Plaintiff alleges defendant "took out some things as well as put some things in my report." Id . Plaintiff argues that "this amounts to defendant withholding evidence."

II. Standard of Review

In reviewing a complaint pursuant to § 1915A, a court must dismiss a prisoner complaint that is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). Whether a complaint states a claim upon which relief can be granted is determined by "the familiar standard for a motion to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6)." Sumner v. Tucker , 9 F.Supp.2d 641, 642 (E.D. Va. 1998). Thus the alleged facts are presumed true, and the complaint should be dismissed only when "it is clear that no relief could be granted under any set of facts that could be proved consistent with the allegations." Hishon v. King & Spalding , 467 U.S. 69, 73 (1984). To survive a 12(b)(6) motion, "a complaint must contain sufficient factual ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.