United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division
LARRY G. JONES, JR., Plaintiff,
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant.
GLEN E. CONRAD, Chief District Judge.
Larry G. Jones, Jr., a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, naming the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Corrections as the sole defendant. Plaintiff requests $100, 000 because he believes the defendant has kept him incarcerated past his release date. This matter is before the court for screening, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.
As a general rule, when a person in custody believes that he is detained illegally, or beyond the length of the sentence imposed, the appropriate remedy is to file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Under that statute, it is necessary for the petitioner to exhaust all available state court remedies before pursuing relief in a federal court. Inasmuch as Mr. Jones asserts that he is being incarcerated past his release date, it would appear that a habeas petition is the appropriate course, once state court remedies are fully exhausted.
To the extent that plaintiff seeks monetary damages for what he believes to be illegal incarceration, the court notes that plaintiff must first establish that his continued incarceration is illegal before he is entitled to seek monetary damages. Heck v. Humphries , 512 U.S. 477 (1994). In any event, the court must dismiss plaintiff's complaint because plaintiff fails to name a person acting under color of state law as defendant. e.g., West v. Atkins , 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988). Neither the Commonwealth of Virginia nor the Department of Corrections is amenable to suit via § 1983. See, e.g., Mt. Healthy City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ. v. Doyle , 429 U.S. 274, 280 (1977); Edelman v. Jordan , 415 U.S. 651, 663 (1974); Gray v. Laws , 51 F.3d 426, 430 (4th ...