United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division
JAMES R. SPENCER, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. In order to state a viable claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff must allege that a person acting under color of state law deprived him or her of a constitutional right or of a right conferred by a law of the United States. See Dowe v. Total ActionAgainstPoverty in Roanoke Valley, 145 F.3d 653, 658 (4th Cir. 1998) (citing 42 U.S.C. § 1983). In his current Complaint, Plaintiff does not identify the particular constitutional right that was violated by the defendants' conduct. Accordingly, by Memorandum Order entered on February 24, 2015, the Court directed Plaintiff to submit a particularized complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of entry thereof. The Court warned Plaintiff that the failure to submit the particularized complaint would result in the dismissal of the action. Thereafter, by Memorandum Order entered on March 16, 2015, the Court granted Plaintiff an extension of eleven (11) days from the date of entry thereof to file a particularized complaint.
More than eleven (11) days have elapsed since the entry of the March 16, 2015 Memorandum Order. Plaintiff failed to submit a particularized complaint. Accordingly, ...