Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Heiderscheidt v. Whitley

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division

June 22, 2015

STEVEN JOSEPH HEIDERSCHEIDT, Plaintiff,
v.
WHITLEY, et al., Defendant(s)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NORMAN K. MOON, District Judge.

Steven Joseph Heiderscheidt, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983, while incarcerated. By its Order entered May 29, 2015, the court advised plaintiff that a failure to update a mailing address after a transfer or release from incarceration will result in dismissal of this action.

The court's mail to plaintiff has been returned as undeliverable, and plaintiff has not contacted the court since May 29, 2015. Plaintiff failed to comply with the court's Order requiring plaintiff to maintain an accurate mailing address. Therefore, the court finds that plaintiff failed to prosecute this action, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), by not complying with the court's May 29, 2015, Order. Accordingly, I dismiss the action without prejudice and deny all pending motions as moot. See Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93, 96 (4th Cir. 1989) (stating pro se litigants are subject to time requirements and respect for court orders and dismissal is an appropriate sanction for non-compliance); Donnelly v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 677 F.2d 339, 340-41 (3d Cir. 1982) (recognizing a district court may sua sponte dismiss an action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b)).

The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Memorandum Opinion and the accompanying Order to the parties.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.